History and Memory ‘Is there such a thing as “history” which is more objective than memory?’ For many years now there has been a strong debate, as regarding wether or not there is such a thing as ‘history’ that is more objective than memory.’ This document illustrates how histories foundation on evidence constrains it partially to subjectivity.Tags: Business Plan Check ListWeb Development AssignmentsDissertationen Online TumWriting An Outline For A Research Paper ApaUsing Proportions To Solve Word ProblemsResearch Thesis In EducationEssays About AgingNative Son By Richard Wright EssaysEssay Word Count Online
Due to memories completely subjective nature, history although also being somewhat subjective, it is a great deal more objective than memory.
To discuss such a statement first one must define the terms ‘history’, ‘objective’ and ‘memory’.
So, for example, William Barak’s ‘Letter to the Editor’ from 1882, complaining about conditions on the Coranderrk Aboriginal reserve, appears before an extract from Catherine Helen Spence’s novel (JW Parker and son), published in 1854 (see p. With anonymous works such as convict ballads, the initial decision was to order them by date of publication.
I objected, since it would have been very odd to find ‘A Convict’s Tour to Hell’, which was not published until 1979, appearing alongside work written over a century later rather than with other material from the pre-1850 convict period.
However, nothing written by an Aboriginal Australian was included, even though Oodgeroo Noonuccal’s groundbreaking collection of poems, , however, included poems by Oodgeroo and Kevin Gilbert, extracts from plays by Jack Davis and Gerry Bostock, and prose by Sally Morgan and others.