41.) The only difference, of course, is that a remedy to “civilization’s” ills is no longer explicitly associated with ideas imbedded in the Old South. What was it that Weaver had said that so raised the ire of my professors?
The mere thought of that today is akin to insanity . It had been so long ago that I could not quite recall.
He believed that Southern values of religion, work ethic, and family could provide a defense against the totalitarian nihilism of fascist and communist statism. Indianapolis : Liberty Press, (OCo LC)568066003Online version: Weaver, Richard M., 1910-1963. "Work with the word" : Southern literature and thought -- The Tennessee Agrarians (1952) -- The Southern Phoenix (1963) -- Agrarianism in exile (1950) -- Contemporary Southern literature (1959) -- Part II.
This Online version: Weaver, Richard M., 1910-1963. "The Contemplation of These Images" : The South in American history -- Two types of American individualism (1963) -- Two orators (1963) -- The older religiouness in the South (1943) -- Albert Taylor Bledsoe (1944) -- Southern chivalry and total war (1945) -- Lee the philosopher (1948) -- Part III.
The arrival of the 20th Century brought about many economic and social changes to the United States. that their judgments were to be in part ethical and aesthetic.
Essay 5 Paragraph - Southern Essays Of Richard Weaver
This changing backdrop set the stage for new interpretations of the South, especially one that places the Old South as a region set against industrialism and progress, and one squarely within the main tradition of Western European civilization. The 1920s ushered in a group of Southern scholars and writers, centered largely at Vanderbilt, who arrived fresh upon the scene and wielded a different sort of pen than that of their Southern predecessors. They were thus concerned immediately with the quality of the South; and this orientation put the case upon an independent footing.” (p.7). Weaver (19101963) was one of the leading figures in the post-World War II development of an intellectual, self-conscious conservatism.His thought and his appreciation of liberty were rooted in his understanding of Southern history. Indianapolis : Liberty Press, (OCo LC)608444633Part I.Weaver was an opponent to their honed ideas, yet they taught him with such a passion that you were not sure what to believe, except for one thing: College was a place where ideas burst forth like exploding stars, and there were simply no safe places – other than going back home to momma or daddy - from which to escape it. When Weaver defended the Old South and attacked modernism, he did so by framing his attacks – for the most part – around arguments from definition. Awarded a doctorate in English from Louisiana State University in 1943, Weaver then went on to teach at the University of Chicago until his untimely death in 1963. Organized in three parts, “Work with the Word”: Southern Literature and Thought, “The Contemplation of These Images”: The South in American History, and “Discipline in Tragedy”: The Southern Tradition for an American Future, each contains numerous chapters.This is a powerful approach (one need only examine the Lincoln and Douglass Debates to see the Illinois rail-splitter wield it with precision) and my professors knew it, and took up Weaver’s challenge with utmost seriousness, demanding the same from us - without our prejudiced experiences but as intelligent and sovereign individuals. He received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Kentucky in 1932 and a M. Of his several books published, his most important are Ideas Have Consequences and The Ethics of Rhetoric. Weaver is a collection of his writings taken from various academic journals and books, and is edited by George M. The more popular of the essays, “Lee the Philosopher,” and “Two Types of American Individualism” will be discussed in subsequent portions of this review.As for the entire review, I will identify the page numbers at the end of various quoted parts from the book as reference points for those who also have the book and wish to follow.The first three essays, “The Tennessee Agrarians,” published in 1952, “The Southern Phoenix,” published in 1963, and “Agrarianism in Exile,” published in 1950 deal largely with the Nashville Agrarians [hereinafter referred to as the Agrarians].Yet, those same professors introduced me to Weaver – none of whom, as I alluded to, agreed with Weaver’s ideas.They were left-wing progressives, likely philosophical materialists to boot, and not, by any measure, academic lightweights.The notion that sparked my memory began to pique my curiosity.I put down the latest oh-so-relevant journal, went straight for my disorganized library, and began shuffling through the chaos of irrelevant knowledge. Weaver was the first book by Weaver that I pulled off my dusty bookshelf, and it did not take long for me to mumble under breath, “Oh, now I recall.” Yet it transported me back in time when there were no laptops or Google, where I was berated by wild-haired professors, each seemingly hunched over and pale-skinned from lack of sun, but infused with the old time religious fervor of New Dealisms and Reagan haters! That Weaver viewed Western Civilization through the lens of the Old South bothered my professors.