During the 1700s, many philosophers and writers began to argue.When the nation became independent, different states began to have their own laws for death penalty.
During the 1700s, many philosophers and writers began to argue.When the nation became independent, different states began to have their own laws for death penalty.Tags: Chemistry Of Aspirin EssayGrade 2 Problem Solving QuestionsHomework On The WeekendsCreative Writing Coursework AryConformity And Obedience Essay ConclusionHelp Me EssaysNinety Five Thesis
This is evident in the crime statistics that the US has seen in the last few decades.
The murder rate has climbed by 122 percent between 19 and the murder rate in New York city alone rose y 400 percent. A study undertaken by MIT showed that based on the 1970 homicide rates, an average American had a higher chance of being murdered than an American soldier who fought in World War II (Koch, 1985).
This practice continues even today in some countries like the US, despite the advancements that we have made as a society.
We are have become more sophisticated than ever before, thanks to many factors such as technological advancements, globalization, education and democracy. In fact, the US is the only advanced democracy where capital punishment by death is not abolished.
They contend that in the south, black men who rape white women receive more death sentences than white men who rape black women.
This creates further rift in a society that has battled a lot of racial issues.In this sense too, death penalty is barbaric because it creates problems between different factions of the society and overall, prevents people from living a healthy and happy life. One of the earliest opponents of death penalty, Cesare Beccaria, believed that capital punishment is cruel.He argued that the idea of killing criminals made the entire nation more brutal."Is it not absurd that the laws which detest and punish homicide, should, in order to prevent, publicly commit murder themselves? The worse part is that this absurdity is followed and in many cases, even supported by courts and some sections of the society.How is it moral to kill one person under the garb of punishment for another person?Death can be never be an appropriate punishment for any crime simply because the society does not give the criminal a chance to get any kind of retribution.When he or she is made to live for the rest of their life in a small room, there is a higher chance for them to atone the sin they committed. For those who argue that death penalty will be a deterrent, it is not true either.This ruling overturned all the state laws that awarded capital punishment for child rape.This ruling also brings up the question of what is the appropriate punishment for what crimes.In 2008, for instance, the Supreme Court overruled a ruling by Louisiana court that convicted a father for raping his eight-year old daughter.The Supreme Court ruled that the punishment is not proportional to the nature of the crime.