Sometimes, the even more disingenuous will reference studies [PDF] which do not even acknowledge gay parents.
Sometimes, the even more disingenuous will reference studies [PDF] which do not even acknowledge gay parents.Tags: Thesis Writing Guide UthmResume Writing Services Grand Rapids MichiganLynda Barry EssayArgument Essay On Smoking Bans6th Grade Research Paper Lesson PlansEssays Urging Ratification Constitution During New York Ratification SEcology Topics For Research PaperDiscrimination And Segregation EssaysMy Internship Experience Essay
Arguments based on “traditional family” will always be insulting, not just to the healthy, well-adjusted children of gay couples, but to the children raised by single parents, step-parents, grandparents, godparents, foster parents, and siblings. “No one has the right to redefine marriage.” Tell that to Henry VIII.
When marriage is a civil, legal institution of the state, the citizenship has a right to redefine marriage in accordance with established equality laws. “The minority should not have the right to dictate to the majority.” Asking to be included within marriage laws is certainly not equivalent to imposing gay marriage on the majority.
I would ask them to stop focusing on my genitals, and start paying attention to my humanity. “Gay marriage will confuse the terms ‘husband’ and ‘wife’, or ‘mother and ‘father’.” Another form of the previous argument. “Gay people cannot have children and so should not be allowed to marry.” The Archbishop of York John Sentamu used a barely disguised version of this argument in a piece for the when he referred to “the complementary nature of men and women”.
It is not hard but I’ll say it slowly just in case … as “husbands”, and married women will refer to themselves … Male parents will be “fathers” and female parents will both be “mothers”. He is insinuating, of course, that homosexual relationships are not complementary by nature because they cannot produce offspring, and therefore they are unnatural and undeserving of the word “marriage”.
” By this logic, what reason is there to provide any minority equal civil rights? “Public opinion polls show most people are against gay marriage.” A petition by the Coalition for Marriage claimed to have 600,000 signatures in opposition to gay marriage in the UK.
It should come as no surprise that the directors of the organisation are religious and manipulation of the results was easy.The Office for National Statistics shows how civil, non-religious marriage made up 68 per cent of all marriages in the UK during 2010.Let us not forget matrimony existed long before Jehovah was even a word you weren’t allowed to say. “Marriage has always been a bond between one man and one woman.” This declaration ignores the legally married gay couples in Canada, Spain, Portugal, Argentina, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Belgium, Netherlands, and South Africa.The majority of UK polls demonstrate a majority in favour of gay marriage.These include a 2004 Gallup poll, a 2008 ICM Research poll, a 2009 Populus poll, a 2010 Angus Reid poll, a 2010 Scottish Social Attitudes survey, a 2011 Angus Reid Public Opinion survey, and a 2012 You Gov survey.Our relationships are just as loving and valid as heterosexual relationships, but our current marriage laws suggest it is not. ” To turn the argument on its head, one simply has to ask why society feels the need to segregate our rights from those of heterosexuals. One does not compromise equal rights otherwise they are not equal rights. “Gay people in the UK already have civil partnerships which provide all the same rights as marriage.” Civil partnerships were born out of politicians pandering to homophobia.We are equally human and we should be treated by the law as such. It has nothing to do with approval, and has everything to do with equality. A step in the right direction, perhaps, but they are a separate form of recognition that reaffirmed society’s wish to keep homosexuals at arm’s length should we somehow “diminish” true marriage. Furthermore, I have been told it is offensive to brand such remarks “bigoted”, and that I am the bully.In rallying against the introduction of equal marriage, religious campaigners have frequently stressed that their objections are not driven by homophobia, and have deployed numerous arguments to demonstrate this.May I refer him to the elderly or infertile straight couples who cannot produce children? “But studies have shown heterosexual parents are better for children.” No, they have not.If a complementary relationship hinges on procreative sex, are these relationships unnatural? Dozens of studies have shown gay people to be entirely capable of raising children.